"Paintings With Personality"

Do All Fine Art Paintings Need A Focal Point?

 

This is the restaurant where Vincent Van Gogh took his meals when he lived in Auvers sur Oise, France. His bedroom is just upstairs. After he shot himself, he was taken up to his bed and sometime later, died in his bed.

A few years ago Honey and I visited Jackson Pollock’s house and studio near East Hampton, Long Island. It’s a great place to visit and interesting to see the cans of paint and brushes Pollock actually used, not to mention the paint all over the studio floor that you know he spilled while working. When I have seen Pollock’s work in museums, I have looked for a focal point, but can’t find one. Instead, the viewer becomes involved in all the drips and splashes of paint continuously moving, never stopping to rest. In that kind of painting the entire work is the focus.

This brings up the question of whether paintings need a focal point to be successful. There isn’t much in life that is all black or all white, and that goes with all things in art, which includes focal points. Some painters argue that the composition can’t be strong without a focal point. Others don’t like any rules, including those that help a painter in planning a good composition. Still others say, sometimes you need a focal point and sometimes you don’t

My opinion is… using a focal point is a wonderful compositional tool, when used correctly, but not absolutely necessary for success. The focal point is what draws the viewer’s eye into a painting. It is the area where a painter wants the viewer to land and stay a bit before moving on around the painting. It doesn’t mean there are no other interesting places to look in a work, just that this one area has received a little more emphasis. The focal point is used to stress key points in a composition. Without that emphasis, the viewer’s eye just wanders around with nothing in particular to look at.

In some paintings, an area of emphasis isn’t needed. In these cases, the painting itself is its own emphasis. For example, Jackson Pollock uses many lines and points to draw attention to the entire surface instead of individual parts. Whether a painting is abstract, non-objective or realistic doesn’t matter, but whether the work needs an area of emphasis, and that is the painter’s decision.

There can also be more than one focal point in a painting. As soon as that happens, the painting becomes more energetic, causing the viewers eye to move back and forth between the areas of focus. In that case one focal area receives more emphasis; while the others get a secondary position, more important than the rest of the composition, but not as important as the primary focal point. A painter creates a focal point in order to get attention, or just change the composition a bit and create a “surprise” for the viewer.

It is important to understand the concept of a focal point in order to be able to make the decision about whether to include a focal point in your painting or not. Do you always use a focal point in your work? Please comment below.   Later, Judy

 

www.judyballance.com

 

 

 

The Nicest Way to View Art

Comments

9 Responses to Do All Fine Art Paintings Need A Focal Point?

Since I only paint people, there never seems much leeway to consider a focal point...unless for some reason I choose to emphasize and eye or hand...come to think of it that might not be a bad idea. Charles Reid is my idol and he never deals with composition or focal point...he just paints what he sees at that moment. I think if the subject is painted well with good contrast and interesting edges, then it will work. I don't want to spend months agonizing over where to put something....as Mel Stabin says, "screw it, just do it!"

I agree with the article. As I was reading, it brought up a question: if I'm out in the woods, do I have to wait for the sun to shine through the trees on a particular area in order for me to enjoy the beauty? I love the majesty of the entirety without a focal point, so I believe the viewer of a painting can, too. It would seem that a focal point is very subjective. Why not let the viewer wander around and find their own focal point...the area that interests them the most. I have some paintings like that, and it's interesting to see each person finding their own favorite spot. I would think this would be the best of all personal interactions a viewer could have with a painting. Thanks for shedding more light (pun intended ;-)) on this subject.

I have not commented before on any writing but thought I'd post my thoughts on there being no need for a focal point. In my opinion, this subject represents a larger topic encountered recently in art shows with "contemporary" work that doesn't follow general art guidelines. The topic surfaced because this style of art is exhibited and judged along side traditional work. I understand the nature of art involves freedom to express as one chooses and with that in mind, I enjoy a wide variety of creative endeavors. However, viewing art with no focal point could mean other standards for evaluation have been discarded. If there are no standards for evaluation, than how does one judge art? Are show awards given to those brave enough to not follow the rules? Perhaps what is being said is that viewers should not be judgmental in any way...not sure. How does one handle art presented that doesn't follow the general standards/rules of creating a masterpiece? These are thoughts to consider...I ponder them quite a bit.

Very good point, Shawn. I hadn't considered judging standards. You made an even better point about the nature of art and judging/judgment. Perhaps that's the reason some people don't enter shows...their clientele preference does not agree with that of jurors. It would seem that the purchase revenue replaces show awards and circumvents the entire judging standards issue. Great subject for endless discussion. The bottom line is just opinion, as you infer. But without structure, what are we?! I ponder...

Although I rarely begin with a planned focal point, I've never finished a painting that I had not subconsciously chosen one for and emphasized it. Whether it is to make a dramatic statement between the sharp thorns of a cactus and the smooth, cool skin of it or a pop of red that automatically becomes the focal point, I become focused on a passage in the work that then stands out because of the effort that has been placed there. And I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one who does that. To me that's a big part of the pull I feel to painting; letting the work itself have a say in how things will go.

I don't want to carry this too far but in my musings I considered the relationship recognized between art, music and writing. I've noticed that every sentence has a subject and verb or it is considered incomplete. Every story should have a point or it is considered rambling and music generally has a melody that runs through out uniting the composition. So should art be similar? Would it be incomplete, rambling or disconnected without a focal point? Something I think about...

Very, very good point. I believe that answers this age-old question very well. Thanks.

Point well taken. Thanks.

Considering Jackson Pollock's work, although it looks random and unplanned, it is actually deceptively complex. As an Art teacher I taught teenagers about Pollock and they all said that that looks easy! So we cleared a space in the middle of the classroom and I gave them a huge piece of paper and they all splattered and splashed to their hearts content. Result? Mud and mess! We went back to viewing samples of Pollock's art on the internet and analysed his work in more detail. This time, in smaller cooperative groups they planned their "messes", limited their colour choices and tried again. Every group came up with a decent "Pollock" painting. The saying that; "you need to know the rules in order to be able to break the rules"; can be applied in the case of Pollock and any abstract art. Jackson Pollock, although he didn't have specific focal points in his work, his thought processes and method of working was very structured in order to produce remarkable works of Art.


Leave a Comment

Remember Your Info
Check this box if you want email updates when people comment on this post